Fomr alternatives: 3 open-source picks
Fomr costs $17/mo — $204 a year. These 3 alternatives replace it for $0, led by HeyForm, OpnForm and Formbricks. All 3 are open source. License, stars and last commit checked by hand on 2026-08-29. No trials, no crippled tiers.
Typeform-style visual forms without the rent; one container to own the whole thing
licenseAGPL-3.0
runsyour machine or their cloud
installHosted signup, or Docker Compose with MongoDB and KeyDB/Redis
enginesOptional OpenAI-compatible API for AI features; default model documented as gpt-3.5-turbo-0125
dataHosted data lives in HeyForm Cloud; self-hosted forms and responses live in MongoDB, cache/session data in KeyDB/Redis, and uploads on the server or S3-compatible storage.
the catch vs FomrHeyForm offers a visual form builder and unlimited self-hosted responses, but its design polish and hosting simplicity are weaker once you leave the hosted service and run MongoDB plus KeyDB yourself.
setupSelf-hosting needs Docker, a domain, reverse proxy/TLS, email configuration, and persistent database/storage volumes.
facts verified 2026-08-10
Open-source forms with unlimited respondents; the free self-hosted builder team stops at two
licenseAGPL-3.0
runsyour machine or their cloud
installHosted signup, or the production Docker deployment
dataHosted data lives in OpnForm Cloud; self-hosted forms and submissions live in MySQL or PostgreSQL, with uploaded files on configured local or object storage.
the catch vs FomrOpnForm gives you open-source forms and self-hosted responses, but the free self-hosted workspace is limited to two users and its design controls are less polished than Fomr's.
setupSelf-hosting requires Docker, a database, a public domain/TLS and mail/storage configuration; the free self-hosted edition allows two workspace users.
facts verified 2026-08-10
Open-source surveys and experience management for in-app, website, and link-based forms
licenseAGPL-3.0 (+EE)
runsyour server
setupnot verified by us yet — check the repo README
facts verified 2026-08-29
What each one is, in full: HeyForm · Formbricks
last updated 2026-08-29 · no votes, no pay-to-list · just what's real
how to choose a Fomr alternative
Easiest to get running
Formbricks — a one-click install, no server to maintain.
Most proven
Formbricks, with 11,000 GitHub stars — the largest community of the 3, which usually means more answers when something breaks.
what you give up by leaving Fomr
- real-time team collaboration
- custom domains and managed TLS
- managed uptime, backups, and abuse controls
- integration catalog
- template and theme depth
None of the picks above covers all of it. The full verdict says which gaps matter.
Fomr alternatives at a glance
| tool | license | running it | platforms | stars | active |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HeyForm | AGPL-3.0 | docker to self-host | web, self-hosted | 8,924 | 2026-08 |
| OpnForm | AGPL-3.0 | docker to self-host | web, self-hosted | 3,566 | 2026-08 |
| Formbricks | AGPL-3.0 (+EE) | one-click install | self-hosted, web | 11,000 | 2026-08 |
why people still pay for Fomr
They pay to publish polished forms without operating a public data-collection service, maintaining email and spreadsheet integrations, or worrying about backups, spam, browser quirks, and lost responses. If none of that applies to you, any pick above saves $204 a year.
questions about switching from Fomr
Is there an open-source alternative to Fomr?
Yes: HeyForm, OpnForm, Formbricks. Every tool on this page is open source: no trials, no crippled tiers.
Can open source really replace Fomr?
Our verdict is YES. Formbricks (11k stars), HeyForm (9k stars), OpnForm (4k stars) are mature open-source replacements for Fomr — self-host in one command and stop paying $17/mo. The full verdict, and what you give up by switching, is at caniopensourceit.online/fomr.
What is the easiest open-source Fomr alternative to set up?
Formbricks — a one-click install, no server to maintain.
What is the most popular open-source Fomr alternative?
By GitHub stars, Formbricks (11,000). HeyForm is next with 8,924.
