Zammad replaces 17 paid apps
One open-source tool, 17 subscriptions it can stand in for. Each pairing below is curated and verified by hand, with the honest catch spelled out. No votes, no pay-to-list.
licenseAGPL-3.0
runsyour server
setupnot verified by us yet — check the repo README
facts verified 2026-08-29
Helpdesk and ticketing that pulls email, chat, phone, and socials into one agent workspace.
the verdict →all Chatbase alternatives →A serious ticket desk with email, chat, SLAs and a knowledge base; setup is the first ticket.
the catchIt is a serious desk but has a smaller marketplace and reporting ecosystem than Zendesk and a heavier self-hosted stack to operate.
the verdict →all Zendesk alternatives →Helpdesk and ticketing that pulls email, chat, phone, and socials into one agent workspace.
the verdict →Helpdesk and ticketing that pulls email, chat, phone, and socials into one agent workspace.
the verdict →all MagicChat alternatives →Helpdesk and ticketing that pulls email, chat, phone, and socials into one agent workspace.
the verdict →all Crisp alternatives →Helpdesk and ticketing that pulls email, chat, phone, and socials into one agent workspace.
the verdict →all Tidio alternatives →A serious ticket desk with email, chat, SLAs and a knowledge base; setup is the first ticket.
the catchIt treats messages as help-desk tickets rather than preserving Front's lighter, email-native team collaboration model.
the verdict →all Front alternatives →A serious ticket desk with email, chat, SLAs and a knowledge base; setup is the first ticket.
the catchIts heavy infrastructure and ticket semantics are less approachable than Help Scout's small-team inbox.
the verdict →all Help Scout alternatives →A serious ticket desk with email, chat, SLAs and a knowledge base; setup is the first ticket.
the catchZammad is a heavyweight ticket suite, so website chat is less focused and much harder to operate than LiveChat.
the verdict →all LiveChat alternatives →A serious ticket desk with email, chat, SLAs and a knowledge base; setup is the first ticket.
the catchIts ticket-centric interface and heavy infrastructure are overkill compared with Groove's lightweight inbox.
the verdict →all Groove alternatives →Helpdesk and ticketing that pulls email, chat, phone, and socials into one agent workspace.
the verdict →A serious ticket desk with email, chat, SLAs and a knowledge base; setup is the first ticket.
the catchIt demands substantially more infrastructure and administration than Freshdesk's hosted service.
the verdict →all Freshdesk alternatives →A mature team inbox with internal notes and ticket owners; it feels like support software because it is.
the catchIt feels like support-ticket software rather than Missive's flexible collaborative email and team-chat workspace.
the verdict →all Missive alternatives →Helpdesk and ticketing that pulls email, chat, phone, and socials into one agent workspace.
the verdict →all Eloqra alternatives →Email, chat, phone and social tickets in one mature desk; Elasticsearch joins the payroll in server chores.
the verdict →all Helpwise alternatives →Mature ticketing, ownership and team workflows; Gmail becomes an input channel, not the workplace.
the catchGmail becomes an input channel rather than the workplace, with heavier ticket semantics and server operations.
the verdict →all Hiver alternatives →A serious ticket desk with email, chat, SLAs and a knowledge base; setup is the first ticket.
the catchIt is fundamentally a ticketing system, not Intercom's polished website messenger, outbound engagement and AI-support platform.
the verdict →all Intercom alternatives →last updated 2026-08-29 · up to $6,816/yr replaced · no votes, no pay-to-list